Monday, December 30, 2019

When Karl Freund’S The Mummy (1932) Was Released, The Horror

When Karl Freund’s The Mummy (1932) was released, the horror genre was already ingrained by Universal Studios and other American studios. The 1930s are considered the beginning of the horror genre’s classic phase. Horror films â€Å"primarily engages us affectively and viscerally-its aim seems to be to scare and disgust us, to raise the hair on the back of our necks or make us cover our eyes†. The horror film of the studios years gives physical shape and specific presence to metaphysical, notions of spirit or moral evil. The Mummy embodies our personal fears and social fears on a larger scale. Death and damnation are central to The Mummy. The star of The Mummy is Imhotep/Ardath Bey played by Boris Karloff. Imhotep (a high Egyptian priest)†¦show more content†¦In the 1930s it was Universal who pioneered the horror film as a low-cost studio genre. Universal Studios and Rise of Horror Films Universal’s origin can be traced back to 1906 when Carl Laemmle gave up his post as a bookkeeper and used his savings to buy and operate a nickelodeon in Chicago. Universal was one of the eight large companies who dominated the industry, though they were not one of the â€Å"majors.† To be a â€Å"major†, a company had to be vertically integrated, owning a theater chain and having an international distribution operation. The five majors Paramount, MGM, 20th Century Fox, Warner Brothers, and RKO dominated the industry. Universal had constant money problems, however, was still successful during the Great Depression of the 1930s. In 1931 Universal released Dracula starring Bela Lugosi and directed by Tod Browning, which a huge success and initiated the horror cycle. Universal also released another successful film Frankenstein (1931) starting Boris Karloff. The follow up to Dracula and Frankenstein was an even greater success, and Universal now looked for another success that would use its new star, Boris Karloff. This new success would be The Mummy (1932). The Filming History of The Mummy The Mummy was filmed during the Great Depression. The financial collapse came against the background of an already

Sunday, December 22, 2019

An Article From The Claremont Institute Recovering The...

This is a critique of an article from the Claremont Institute Recovering the American Idea, A Golf Story, By: Thomas D. Klingenstein, Posted: April 17, 2011, this article appeared in: Vol. XI, Numbers 1 2 - Winter/Spring 2010/11. Barry Mills, the president of Bowdoin College, in his assembly address raised an imperative worry, he said, various parents are unwilling to send their kids to Bowdoin or to its sister schools in light of the fact that they are seen to be excessively liberal, and too withdrawn with standard America. To do this he recounted a golf anecdote about the article s writer. The article’s writer defends himself against statements he says he never said. The writer according to Mills states, I would never support†¦show more content†¦In general, he took Mill s golf story to be a withdrawal of his expressed longing to expand the differing qualities of perspectives on grounds. Expressing that Mills continued in this withdrawing manner all through his loc ation: first saying that the absence of assorted qualities of perspectives on grounds is an issue, then actually presuming that it wasn t generally an issue all things considered. The author points out that Mill’s admits that Bowdoin is a liberal school, and that they need more diversity however the author does not think Mills has an answer to the problem pointing out more contradictions that Mr. Mills makes. The author then empowers Mills and the Bowdoin family to consider important their objective of expanding the assorted qualities of perspectives on grounds. The writer’s fundamental purpose of this article was that Mills doesn t have the response to the absence of scholarly assorted qualities at Bowdoin. The writer contended that there was insufficient celebration of our regular American personality. He contended against ideological consistency, on the grounds that it deprived students of the intellectual diversity for the advancement of critical thinking. He contends that Bowdoin has various courses that deal with some group aspect of America, yet for all intents and purposes none that deals with America all in all. That the school concentrates on social or social history that takes a gander at the world through theShow MoreRelatedProject Mgmt296381 Words   |  1186 Pagesleadership. His research and consulting activities focus on project management. He has published numerous articles on matrix management, product development, and project partnering. He has been honored with teaching awards from both the Oregon State University MBA program and the University of Oregon Executive MBA program. He has been a member of the Portland, Oregon, chapter of the Project Management Institute since 1984. In 1995 he worked as a Fulbright scholar with faculty at the Krakow Academy of Economics

Friday, December 13, 2019

Econ-545 Week 6 Quiz Free Essays

| 1. | Question: | (TCO F) The size of the labor force in a community is 1,000, and 850 of these folks are gainfully employed. In this community, 50 people over the age of 16 do not have a job and are not looking for work. We will write a custom essay sample on Econ-545 Week 6 Quiz or any similar topic only for you Order Now In addition, 80 people in the community are under the age of 16. The unemployment rate is ______. | | | Student Answer:|   | Unemployment rate=unemployed/labor force*100 150/1000*100=15% 1000-850=150 (number of people unemployed) then divided by total labor force divided by 100|   | Instructor Explanation:| The unemployment rate is calculated by dividing the number of unemployed by the labor force. The labor force is calculated by subtracting three things from the population (# under 16, # of institutionalized adults, and # not looking for work). In this example,  you are given the size of the labor force (1,000), and you are also told that 850 are employed. Therefore, 150 are unemployed, and the  unemployment rate is simply 150/1,000 or 15%. | | | | Points Received:| 15 of 15| | Comments:| | | | | | | 2. | Question: | (TCO F) Suppose  nominal GDP  in 2005 was $15 trillion, and in 2006 it was $16 trillion. The general price index in 2005 was 100, and in 2006 it was 103. Between 2005 and 2006,  real GDP  rose by what percent? | | | Student Answer:|   | Nominal GDP and REAL GDP must be equal in the base year. 2005 15tr, price index = 100 since nominal and real GDP must be equal in the base year 15tr/1. 03=16. 56tr(16. 56-16. 00)/16. 00=4% or 3. 5%|   | Instructor Explanation:| You need to make use of the inflation formula for the GDP deflator here and compare results between the two years. For 2005: 100 = [$15 T / Real GDP] x 100 So, Real GDP must equal $15 T. You could also recognize that Real GDP and nominal GDP are the same in the base year. For 2006: 103 = [$16 T / Real GDP] x 100 1. 03 = [$16 T / Real GDP] Real GDP = $16 T / 1. 03 So, Real GDP must equal $15. 534 T. The percentage increase in Real GDP will then be [(15. 534 – 15) / 15] x 100 = (0. 534 / 15) x 100 = 3. 56%  Therefore Real GDP increases by 3. 56% between 2005 and 2006. | | | | Points Received:| 19 of 20| | Comments:| | | | | | | 3. | Question: | (TCO F) The consumer price index was 198. 3 in January of 2006, and it was 202. 4 in January of 2007. Therefore, the rate of inflation in 2006 was about ______. | | | Student Answer:|   | 202. -198. 3=4. 1 4. 1/198. 3=. 02067 or 2. 07%|   | Instructor Explanation:| The rate of inflation is the rate of change of the inflation indicator, or more specifically: [(New Price Index – Old Price Index) / (Old Price Index)] x 100 In this case this equals, [(202. 4 – 198. 3) / 198. 3] x 100 = (4. 1 / 198. 3) x 100 = 2. 07% or approximately 2%. | | | | Points Received:| 15 of 15| | Comments:| | | | | | | 4. | Question: | (TCO E) (10 points) As the U. S. dollar appreciates in value relative to the Japanese Yen, what happens to the price of U. S. goods in Japan? What happens to the price of Japanese goods in the U. S.? (10 points) Why would a country (for example China) choose to keep their currency relatively pegged to the U. S. dollar? If the U. S. dollar were to appreciate considerably against most currencies, what would be the effect on Chinese exports to countries other than the U. S.? | | | Student Answer:|   | the price of goods in Japan start going up. the price Japanese goods in US start going down. China keeps its currency pegged in order to sell their goods for a cheaper price in the US and to make the US market dependent on their product. If dollar appreciate it will drag China’s currency with it,in other words reducing China’ export. |   | Instructor Explanation:| When a country’s currency appreciates, it becomes more valuable versus the other currency we’re comparing against. So, in this case, it would take fewer dollars  to purchase the same amount of Japanese Yen, U. S. goods become more expe nsive to Japanese buyers, and Japanese goods become cheaper to U. S. buyers. A country such as China might choose to peg their currency to the U. S. dollar to keep prices stable for a key  trading partner like the U. S. If the U. S. dollar would appreciate considerably against most  currencies, this would not affect China trade with the U. S. , but  Chinese goods would become more expensive to their other trading partners, and could cause Chinese exports to these other markets to decrease. | | | | Points Received:| 17 of 20| | Comments:| | | | | | | 5. | Question: | (TCO E) Suppose the Indian rupee price of one  British pound is 54. 392 rupees for each pound. A hotel room in London costs 120 pounds, while a similar hotel room in New Delhi costs 6,500 Indian rupees. In which city is the hotel room cheaper, and by how much? | | | Student Answer:|   | London hotel room 120 pound or 6527 rupee (120*54. 392) India hotel room 119. 50 pounds (6500/54. 392) or 6500 rupee the hotel room is cheaper in India for . 50 cent in pound or 27 rupees|   | Instructor Explanation:| Since the exchange rate is 1  pound = 54. 392 Indian rupees, we can convert the price of the hotel room in London to Indian rupees and then be able to compare. 120 pounds = rupees(120 x 54. 392) = 6,527 rupees. Since the hotel room in New Delhi  costs 6,500 rupees, it must be that the hotel room costs 27 rupees  more in London than in New Delhi. | | | | Points Received:| 15 of 15| | Comments:| | | | | | | 6. Question: | (TCO E) Answer the next question on the basis of the following production possibilities data for Egypt and Greece:   Egypt production possibilities: A  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  B  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  C  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  D  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  E Shirts  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚     Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   0  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   3  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  6  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚     Ã‚  9  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  12 Pants  Ã‚     Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   24  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  18  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   12     Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚        6  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  0 Greece production possibilities: A  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  B  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  C  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  D  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  E Shirts  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  40  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  30  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   20  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  10  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   0 Pants  Ã‚     Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   0  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚     Ã‚   40  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   80  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚     Ã‚  120  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  160 Refer to the above data. What would be feasible terms of trade between Egypt and Greece? | | | Student Answer:|   | terms of trade between 2 countries lie somewhere between the opportunity costs in the 2 countries. in this case Egypt 1 shirt= 2 pants and in Greece case 1 shirt=4 pants, so the only feasible term of trade bet ween the 2 countries would be anywhere in between these limits anything between 2 and 4 shirts and pants would work. t any terms of trade higher or lower than 2 or 4 pants per shirt , one of the countries would be able to do better than the terms of trade simply by trading off resources in their own country. |   | Instructor Explanation:| Feasible terms of trade between 2 countries lie somewhere between the opportunity costs in the 2 countries. In this case, in Egypt —   1 Shirt = 2 Pants, and in Greece — 1 Shirt = 4 Pants. So,  the only feasible terms of trade between the 2 countries would be anywhere in between these limits  Ã¢â‚¬â€ anything between 2 and 4 Pants per Shirts would work. At any terms of trade higher or lower than  2 to 4 Pants per Shirts, one of the countries would be able to do better than the terms of trade simply by trading off resources in their own country. | | | | Points Received:| 20 of 20| | Comments:| | | | | | | 7. | Question: | (TCO F) The Republic of Republic produces two goods/services, fish (F) and chips (C). In 2006, the 1000 units of F produced sold for $8 per unit and the 5000 units of C produced sold for $1 per unit. In 2007, the 1500 units of F produced sold for $10 per unit, and the 6,000 units of C produced sold for $2 per unit. Calculate Real GDP for 2007, assuming that 2006 is the base year. | | | Student Answer:|   | base year 2006 1,000 units of fish at 8/unit =8,000 5,000 units of chips at 1/unit =5,000 GDP=13,000 2007 1,500 units of fish at 10/unit-15,000 6,000 units of chips at 2/ units at 2/unit =12000 GDP =27,000 Real GDP with 2006 as the base year 1500 units of fish at 8/unit =12,000 6,000 unit chips at 1/unit = 6,000 Real GDP =18,000 18,000-13,000/18,000 GDP grew by 28%|   | Instructor Explanation:| For 2006, Nomimal GDP  = ($8 x 1000) + ($1 x 5000) = $13,000. Real GDP for 2006 would be the same ($13,000). For 2007, Nominal GDP = ($10 x 1500) + ($2 x 6000) = $27,000. Real GDP for 2007 would be ($8 x 1500) + ($1 x 6000) = $18,000. That is, when calculating real GDP for a given year you use the production numbers for that year and the prices from the base  year. | | | | Points Received:| 12 of 15| | Comments:| | | | | | | 8. | Question: | (TCO F)  Country A  produces two goods,  elephants  and  saddles. In the year  2006, the  10 units of elephants produced sold for $2,000 per unit and the  25 units of  saddles produced sold for $200 per unit. In 2007, the  20 units of  elephants produced sold for $3,000 per unit, and the 50 units of  saddles produced sold for $300 per unit. Real GDP for 2007, assuming that  2006 is the base year, is ______. | | | Student Answer:|   | base year 2006 10 units at 2000 per unit =20,000 25 saddles at 200=5000 GDP=25,000 2007 20 units at 3,000 per unit =6,000 50 saddles at 300=15000 GDP=21,000 real GDP with 2006 as the base year 20 units of elephants at 3000 = 60000 for 50 units of saddles at 25 =1250 real GDP 61250 61250-21000/61250 real GDP grew by 65%.   | Instructor Explanation:| Real GDP is calculated for a given year by using the quantities produced in that year and substituting the base year prices. In this example we get: 20 ($2,000) +  50 ($200) = $40,000 + $10,000 = $50,000. | | | | Points Received:| 12 of 15| | Comments:| | | | | | | 9. | Question: | (TCO E) A Honda Accord sells for $28,000 in the United States and for SF35,520 in Switzerland. Given an exchange rate of SF1. 5 = $1, how do the car prices of both countries compare? | | | Student Answer:|   | with an exchange rate of SF1. 25=$1 28,000*1. 25=35,000 SF price is 35,520 the car sells for SF520 more in Switzerland that it does in the US. |   | Instructor Explanation:| At an exchange rate of $1 = SF1. 25: $28,000 would equal   (1. 25 x 28,000) Swiss Francs = SF35,000, meaning that the car sells for SF520 more in Switzerland than it does in the U. S. Points 15 of 15| | | | | | | How to cite Econ-545 Week 6 Quiz, Papers

Thursday, December 5, 2019

Industry and Environmental Analysis of Kuwait †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Industry and Environmental Analysis of Kuwait. Answer: The Internet is responsible for the creation of several new industries like online auctions as well as the digital marketplace. The greatest and most noteworthy effect of the internet lies in its capacity to cause the reconfiguration of the existing industries which had been controlled by high costs for the communication, gathering of information, or the accomplishment of transactions. There have been certain trends regarding the influence of the internet on each of the five forces, shaping the structure of an industry. Michael Porter stated that in any particular industry, whether it is domestic or international or produces a product or a service, the rules of competition are embodied in five competitive forces: the entry of new competitors, the threat of substitutes, the bargaining power of suppliers and rivalry among existing competitors. The entry of new competitors: Digital business is undoubtedly responsible for the type of the competition in the market. It is not just the conventional industry competitors which need to be considered but importance also needs to be given to the new entrants outside the industry who are capable of new and digitally based models and proposals for the required values. It has been seen that technological start-ups as well as huge companies have envisioned and also created a new business model from the base stage which has been powered by a innovative platform ecosystem for business of a digital nature. The leveraging of familiar and also social, mobile, cloud technologies as well as analytics are not enough. Valuable inputs are being made in terms of intelligent automation, The Internet of Things and also the topic of cyber security. This is basically done to additional improve value proposition of their appropriate platform (Gackenbach 2011). The new entrants to the business and the existing digital situation can move in easily in Case the traditional barriers to entry are lowered. A digitally based business model needs much less amount of capital and has the possibility of bringing the large economies of scale as suitable examples. The threat of substitutes: Threat of products and services are some of the top factors which are necessary and are to be considered under the substitutes of the digital industry. The digital business can happen in either a purely digital substitute or a substitute which of hybrid nature. There are extremes to this particular situation. Either the services are wrapped around a physical product or some other sort of extreme which has several examples. The industrial internet is another extreme in the particular line which can cause any sort of threat. Household automation and personal fitness products also comprise an extreme. The threat of substitutes is considered to be high in major cases in view of the many existent industries which is due to the reason that the switching costs are small and buyer prosperity to the substitutes is also high. The inclination to switch from the traditional model is high due to the consumer wait times for the taxis and the lack of visibility or so on. The long term stream of revenue is considered with reference to the digital services and sale of specific products. The bargaining power of buyers: The most important of the five forces influencing the industry competitors is actually the bargaining power of the buyers. It is the strongest of the five forces because the largest and most impactful driver of the digital business arises as a result of requirements and the potential of the consumers and the customers themselves. The bargaining power in this particular case shows a set of new expectations for the customers and the customer experience of a digital nature and it necessitates the recurrent innovation of the corporate nature and business models procedures, operations and the services of the scenario. At present the customers have much more power of bargaining which is due to the ready access to the internet and the information, ideas from social sources, the low costs of switching and the digital channels, sensitivity of price, access to the substitute products and services along with the greater ease with which they are used a also the convenience and also the increased competitiveness of the industry as a result of the other impacting forces (Dewan, Ganley and Kraemer 2010). The bargaining power of suppliers: Suppliers have the authority of either slowing down or accelerating the implementation of a digitally based business or how it influences the entire circumstances The people pursuing the digital models themselves for example the utilization of the APIs in order to streamline their ability to create new partnerships and themanagement of the existing ones in help in the acceleration of their chosen models themselves. Examples which can be considered in this particular regard are the digital and sharing economy in which the suppliers and the other constituents work in order to make sure that the business model and the innovations in the process still adhere to those rules which have been established, concerning the privacy, security and the safety. This is a optimistic and required development as it can help in keeping new models honest along with the bargaining power of the buyers (Palacios-Marqus, Soto-Acosta and Merig 2015). The rivalry among the existing competitors: It has been seen that the present competitors are all looking at digital businesses who are trying to understand the existing disruptions which are occurring and the preparation of their responses. It is seen that the comparative low cost of the digital business models help in the reduction of the entry and the exit barriers. The rivalry among the competitors are often in play and in the recent times the digital business has caused much of a stir which needs to be studied and understood. Overall in the preparation of several business initiatives, the five forces framework can be a suitable way in which the various facts impacting the digital business can be considered. It is necessary to understand how the factors react. In combination to the usual factors the new aspects affecting the industry are to be properly studied and understood. Kuwait does not possess SME development strategy and programme and also the corresponding institutionalization of support. The policies as well as the regulations shaping the particular sector are spread over numerous ministries and agencies. In addition to this the provision of services is cracked as well as inept. There is the lack of a central body which might synchronize several support activities. Otherwise in the Gulf region, several countries exist which have been able to address severe deficiencies in the past time by the establishment of a centralized body in charge of the promotion of SMEs. SMEs have been found to be suffering due to the limitations in the available reserves, specifically in the areas of training, business information and marketing. Training is not given proper importance. It needs to be targeted properly and information services need to be properly provided. Training needs to be targeted so that the information services are not scattered. There is the prob lem of proper counselling, or crucial advice which can help the enterprises grow. There needs to be proper awareness regarding the profit of external assistance by the provision of information on present services as well as providers (Elali and Al-Yacoub 2016). Potential entrepreneurs need to be interested and motivated towards their business which they are desirable of establishing. They need to be aware of available options and the option which are the most striking to them. Being uncovered to the entrepreneurial roles is a favourable factor as this helps in gaining suitable knowledge on entrepreneurship. They also need to come into contact which a range of opportunity factors. These include the access to suitable information on a variety of business ideas, counselling as well as capitalistic ideas and support. The aspiring entrepreneurs also need to have technical skills, business andmanagement skills which can either be gained through education and experience or through the expertise and experience of other individuals (Al-Najem et al. 2013). In the absence of proper motivation, notable entrepreneurs will not be able to perform any action towards the starting of any business. In case they are enthused to take proper action they need to be exposed to the vast range of opportunities available. Therefore there needs to be proper awareness of entrepreneurship as an attractive option for employment, also the profile availability of successful role models and changed attitudes towards the development of business. There also need to be enhanced opportunities for learning, in order to help aspiring people to learn to become successful entrepreneurs. There needs to be the start of a proper business by the entrepreneurship orientation, education and instruction. In addition to this there needs to be proper support services in order to make entrepreneurial learning training available to all and also the presence of small business counselling opportunities. At present in Kuwait, the entrepreneurship levels are low while the unemployment of youth is high. The country is not being able to generate suitable opportunities for start-ups and therefore there needs to be a proper awareness regarding entrepreneurship. Thus the objective in the long run is to create a much suitable climate of entrepreneurship that helps in the acceleration of the rate of start-up business. References Al-Najem, M., Dhakal, H., Labib, A. and Bennett, N., 2013. Lean readiness level within Kuwaiti manufacturing industries.International Journal of Lean Six Sigma,4(3), pp.280-320. Chang, Y.S., Kim, J.A. and Kim, Y., 2017. Convergence Analysis of the Entrepreneurship Start-Up Barriers. DeNardis, L., 2012. Hidden levers of Internet control: An infrastructure-based theory of Internet governance.Information, Communication Society,15(5), pp.720-738. Dewan, S., Ganley, D. and Kraemer, K.L., 2010. Complementarities in the diffusion of personal computers and the Internet: Implications for the global digital divide.Information Systems Research,21(4), pp.925-940. Elali, W. and Al-Yacoub, B., 2016. Factors affecting entrepreneurial intentions among Kuwaitis.World Journal of Entrepreneurship,Management and Sustainable Development,12(1), pp.18-34. Gackenbach, J. ed., 2011.Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications. Academic Press. Palacios-Marqus, D., Soto-Acosta, P. and Merig, J.M., 2015. Analyzing the effects of technological, organizational and competition factors on Web knowledge exchange in SMEs.Telematics and Informatics,32(1), pp.23-32.